GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱

bt365体育平台3 2025-10-02 18:34:54 admin 9006 484

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱比大多数笔记本电脑更强大。可折叠的 Pocket 4 在 8.8 英寸的小巧机身上集成了完整笔记本电脑的性能和功能，而且几乎没有任何妥协。尤其是 AMD 处理器，使其运行速度超过大多数迷你 PC、游戏掌上电脑甚至传统笔记本电脑。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/01/2025 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...

🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 🇩🇪 AMD Convertible / 2-in-1 Gaming Handheld Zen 5 Touchscreen

评语：真正的笔记本电脑替代品，但也有不足之处GPD Pocket 4 成功地将传统笔记本电脑的性能和功能整合到了体积更小的笔记本电脑中。它几乎改进了 Pocket 3 的所有方面 Pocket 3尤其是在显示质量和性能方面，它可以满足办公、停靠、旅行，甚至是中轻度图形编辑和游戏的需要，只要您有外接鼠标和键盘。考虑到其小巧的体积，该机型能提供的功能和在许多方面的出色表现给我们留下了深刻印象。

Test device courtesy of GPD

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

当然，小巧的机身也有一些不可避免的缺点。最明显的是，打字体验很拥挤，电池续航时间一般，性能比搭载完全相同的 Ryzen AI 9 处理器的其他 PC 慢几个档次。这些弊端可能是无可奈何的，但为了获得更好的用户体验，还应该解决其他一些问题，如运行高负载时高亢的风扇噪音、缺少网络摄像头快门以及 VRR 和 FreeSync 的缺失。附带的主动式手写笔也会让平板模式的使用更加理想。

Pros+ 高质量 1600p144 触摸屏，具有 DCI-P3 色彩

+ 比许多传统笔记本电脑速度更快

+ 大音量立体声扬声器

+ 小巧紧凑

+ 良好的端口选择Cons- 游戏时风扇噪音大且明显

- 低频 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU

- 不支持 OLED、HDR 或 FreeSync

- 游戏时电池寿命短

- 固态硬盘在负载情况下会出现节流

价格和供应情况Indiegogo 页面列出了基本配置为较旧的 Ryzen 7 8840U、16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD，售价为 895 美元，而我们的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、32 GB 内存和 2 TB 评测配置则超过 1400 美元。

亚马逊目前出货的 Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 365 配置价格为 1355 美元。

AmazonGPD Pocket 4: Mini Laptop with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 365 CPU, Radeon 890M GPU, 32GB LPDDR5X RAM, 2TB PCIe Gen4 SSD, 8.8 Inch 2.5K 144Hz Display, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, Modular AI Handheld PC

可能的替代品比较

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay

1.80.2%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘32 GB MemoryAmazon: List Price: 1400 USD777 g22.2 mm8.80"2560x1600343 PPIIPS

2.80.3% v7 (old)GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,489.99GPD Win 4 2025 Handheld Gami...2. $1,609.99GPD Win 4 2025 [AMD AI 370-3...3. $1,049.95GPD Win 4,Portable Handheld ...List Price: 1100 USD607 g28 mm6.00"1920x1080367 PPIIPS

3.86.3% v7 (old)GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7 ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 1000 USD730 g20 mm8.00"1920x1200283 PPIIPS

4.79.5% v7 (old)Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100 ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ⎘8 GB Memory, 128 GB SSDList Price: 381 EUR1.6 kg21.2 mm11.60"1366x768TN

5.88.4% v7 (old)Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,539.99Microsoft Surface Pro 9 (QLT...2. $1,349.00Microsoft Surface Pro 9 Tabl...3. $1,699.00Microsoft Surface Pro 9, 13....List Price: 2200€877 g9.3 mm13.00"2880x1920266 PPIIPS

6.81% v7 (old)Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030 ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 605 ⎘4 GB Memory, 128 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $333.13Acer TravelMate Spin B3 B311...2. $263.38acer TravelMate Spin B3 B311...3. $17.99Galaxy Bang AC Adapter Charg...List Price: 399 Euro1.5 kg20.95 mm11.60"1920x1080190 PPIIPS

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Table of Contents评语：真正的笔记本电脑替代品，但也有不足之处规格案例连接性输入设备显示屏性能排放量能源管理笔记本检查评级

GPD Pocket 4 继承了三年前的 Pocket 3，引入了更新的硬件功能和最新的 AMD Ryzen AI Zen 5 处理器。它本质上是一款 8.8 英寸 UMPC，旨在整合与全尺寸笔记本电脑相同的功能和性能。

我们的测试机是最高端的 SKU，配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU、Radeon 890M GPU 和 32 GB LPDDR5x 7500 MT/s 内存，售价约 1300 美元。较少的 SKU 可能会配备 Ryzen AI 9 365 或 Ryzen 7 8840U，分别配备较慢的 Radeon 880M 和 780M 图形处理器。1600p144 触摸屏在所有选项中都是固定的。

Pocket 4 的替代产品包括其他高性能或以游戏为中心的掌上电脑，如Asus ROG Ally X,Ayaneo Flip KB, 或MSI Claw 。

更多 GPD 评论：

迷你 WinG1 eGPUWin 4Win Max 2

规格

GPD Pocket 4ProcessorAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 28 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Graphics adapterAMD Radeon 890M, Core: 2112 MHz, LPDDR5x, 32.0.12033.1030Memory32 GB , LPDDR5x, 7500 MT/s, Dual-ChannelDisplay8.80 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 343 PPI, 10-point capacitive, YHB03P24, IPS, glossy: yes, 144 HzMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHSoundcardAMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio ControllerConnections1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: Accelerometer, KVMNetworkingRealtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 22.2 x 206.8 x 144.5Battery45 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 1440p30Primary Camera: 5 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 2x 2 W stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Wincontrols, Motion Assistant, 12 Months WarrantyWeight777 g, Power Supply: 202 g

Price1400 USDAmazonNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

案例机身比 Pocket 3 稍大、稍重，以适应屏幕尺寸的增加（8.0 英寸增至 8.8 英寸）。整体设计的边缘和边角也更加扁平，让人联想到任天堂 DS Lite。除此之外，机身采用了与以前相同的铝合金材料，质量和观感与以前相差无几。

尺寸比较

Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U GPD Win 4 GPD Pocket 4 GPD Pocket 3 DIN A4 ❌

连接性与 Pocket 3 相比，这次减少了 USB-A 端口。作为回报，PLEXTALK Pocket 4 增加了一个 USB-C 端口，与 USB-A 端口相比，USB-C 端口的通用性更强。需要注意的是，两个 USB-C 端口中只有一个支持 USB4 设备。

前部无端口

右：USB-A 2.0，3.5 毫米耳机USB-A 2.0、3.5 毫米耳机右侧：USB-A 2.0、3.5 毫米耳机

后部RJ-45 (2.5 Gbps)、USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 (10 Gbps) w/ DisplayPort + Power Delivery、USB-C 4.0 (40 Gbps) w/ DisplayPort + Power Delivery、MicroSD 读卡器

左：重置按钮、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen.SD 读卡器

SD Card Reader

average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

63.3 MB/s +92%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

32.9 MB/s Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

25.5 MB/s -22%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

92.8 MB/s +24%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

74.7 MB/s Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

27.6 MB/s -63%

交流

Networking

iperf3 transmit AX12GPD Pocket 3Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

1058 (914min - 1225max) MBit/s Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Wireless-AC 9560

670 (627min - 705max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AX12GPD Pocket 3Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

1144 (1084min - 1189max) MBit/s Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Wireless-AC 9560

636 (611min - 645max) MBit/s iperf3 transmit AXE11000GPD Pocket 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

1281 (1157min - 1433max) MBit/s Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX201

882 (470min - 936max) MBit/s -31%GPD Win 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

669 (485min - 777max) MBit/s -48% iperf3 receive AXE11000GPD Pocket 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

1380 (1142min - 1522max) MBit/s GPD Win 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

990 (909min - 1056max) MBit/s -28%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX201

925 (906min - 944max) MBit/s -33% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzMicrosoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1628 (1529min - 1677max) MBit/s +33%GPD Pocket 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

1224 (1083min - 1345max) MBit/s GPD Win 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

712 (410min - 795max) MBit/s -42% iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzMicrosoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1632 (1569min - 1654max) MBit/s +73%GPD Win 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

951 (921min - 975max) MBit/s +1%GPD Pocket 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210

942 (915min - 1026max) MBit/s

GPD Pocket 4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1224 (1083-1345) GPD Pocket 4; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (915-1026)

网络摄像头500 万像素网络摄像头位于屏幕左侧边缘，与大多数其他笔记本电脑相比角度偏斜。没有隐私快门，也不支持红外功能。

24.5 ∆E14.3 ∆E20.7 ∆E22.1 ∆E22.6 ∆E18.9 ∆E14.7 ∆E21.3 ∆E16.6 ∆E17.3 ∆E13.9 ∆E16.6 ∆E16.6 ∆E13 ∆E19.2 ∆E9.1 ∆E20.1 ∆E21.5 ∆E1.8 ∆E6.5 ∆E11.4 ∆E15.4 ∆E16.4 ∆E12.5 ∆EColorChecker GPD Pocket 4: 16.12 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 24.5 ∆E

GPD Pocket 4

维护底部面板由九颗小型十字螺丝固定，维修起来相对容易。不过，由于只有电池和 M.2 2280 固态硬盘可拆卸，因此升级空间不大。

Pocket 4 内部结构可持续性生产商没有提到在生产过程中使用了回收材料。包装本身主要是硬纸板和一些保护性塑料包装。

配件和保修可选配件包括 MicroSD 读卡器、KVM、RS232 或 4G LTE 等扩展模块，所有这些都必须用螺丝固定在机身背面。如果能提供触控笔或便携包就更好了。

如果在美国购买，制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。

输入设备键盘键盘与 Pocket 3 上的键盘几乎是 1:1 的匹配，甚至包括按键尺寸和辅助功能。奇怪的是，这次大写锁定键没有 LED 指示灯，原因不明。

触摸板触摸板的大小与以前一样，为 6.3 x 3.3 厘米。虽然它能可靠地控制光标，但实际的鼠标按钮在设备的另一侧，因此需要双手才能有效地使用鼠标。如果没有外接鼠标，最好使用触摸屏进行大部分输入。

狭窄的键盘需要一些时间适应显示屏1440p 144 Hz IPS 触摸屏是 Pocket 3 的重大升级。不仅分辨率和刷新率都更高，色彩覆盖率、响应时间和亮度也都明显提高，真正实现了显而易见的差异。小尺寸和高 PPI 也让 2.5K 显示屏看起来像 4K 屏幕一样清晰。

该显示屏的一个主要缺点是缺乏对 FreeSync、Windows VRR 和 HDR 的支持，而这三种技术分别可以减少屏幕撕裂、延长电池寿命和改善图像质量。OLED 本来也是不错的选择，但制造商可能出于电池寿命的考虑而放弃了。

边缘到边缘的玻璃保护

窄边框

清晰的亚像素阵列，无明显颗粒感问题

边缘和角落有轻微不均匀的背光出血现象

568.8cd/m²521.5cd/m²511.3cd/m²567.7cd/m²511.2cd/m²487.9cd/m²560.6cd/m²508.6cd/m²475cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessYHB03P24 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 568.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 523.6 cd/m² Minimum: 6.79 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 84 %Center on Battery: 511.2 cd/m²Contrast: 1278:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.54 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}calibrated: 0.95ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}90% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)99.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D)92.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.26CCT: 8125 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

GPD Pocket 4YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 HzGPD Win 4G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6", 60 HzGPD Pocket 3Digital Flat Panel, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 60 HzAsus BR1104CGA-N00007XATN, 1366x768, 11.6", 60 HzMicrosoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255ULP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13", 120 HzAcer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKAU Optronics B116HAN05.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6", 60 HzDisplay-23%-37%-46%-19%-39% Display P3 Coverage (%)92.763.1 -32%51.1 -45%43.19 -53%65.6 -29%49.6 -46% sRGB Coverage (%)99.692 -8%74.7 -25%64.95 -35%97.7 -2%72.9 -27% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)9064.6 -28%52.8 -41%44.62 -50%67.7 -25%51.3 -43%Response Times-9%-57%-26%20%-22% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)27.9 ?(13.4, 14.5)26.8 ?(12.5, 14.3) 4%37.2 ?(17.6, 19.6) -33%37.68 ?(19, 18.68) -35%13 ?(6, 7) 53%34 ?(16, 18) -22% Response Time Black / White * (ms)17.2 ?(8.3, 8.9)20.9 ?(11.4, 9.5) -22%31.2 ?(17.2, 14) -81%20 ?(15, 5) -16%19.4 ?(6.8, 12.6) -13%21 ?(11, 10) -22% PWM Frequency (Hz)25000 ?(71)29896 ?(55)Screen-29%-38%-39%14%-6%Brightness middle (cd/m²)511.2413.1 -19%438.4 -14%290 -43%455 -11%272 -47%Brightness (cd/m²)524407 -22%421 -20%274 -48%453 -14%267 -49%Brightness Distribution (%)8481 -4%92 10%87 4%94 12%87 4%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.40.39 2%0.4 -0%0.48 -20%0.38 5%0.3 25%Contrast (:1)12781059 -17%1096 -14%604 -53%1197 -6%907 -29%Colorchecker dE 2000 *4.546.97 -54%5.02 -11%7.68 -69%1.7 63%4.1 10%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *8.9614.11 -57%9.59 -7%9.6 -7%3.8 58%9.08 -1%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.951.24 -31%4.05 -326%1.9 -100%1.5 -58%Greyscale dE 2000 *6.49.9 -55%4 37%7.4 -16%1.5 77%4.03 37%Gamma2.26 97%2.04 108%2.29 96%2.658 83%2.17 101%2.23 99%CCT8125 80%9571 68%7087 92%8017 81%6761 96%6557 99%Total Average (Program / Settings)-20% /

-25%-44% /

-41%-37% /

-39%5% /

8%-22% /

-16%* ... smaller is better

对比 sRGB

对 P3开箱即按照 P3 标准校准色彩，以充分发挥显示屏大于 92% P3 的宽广色彩。不过，色温略微偏冷。

校准前的灰度

校准前的饱和扫频

校准前的 ColorChecker

校准后的灰度

校准后的饱和扫频

校准后的 ColorChecker

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.3 ms rise↘ 8.9 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey27.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise↘ 14.5 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8224 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

触摸屏的亮度比其他大多数手持设备都要高，最大亮度略高于 500 尼特，在阴暗处也能使用。眩光仍然存在，但不会过分分散注意力，除非你站在阳光直射或阴暗处。

阴天下的户外活动

室外阴凉处

阴天下的户外活动宽广的 IPS 视角，适合纵向或横向模式性能

测试条件在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。我们还将 BIOS 设置为默认设置，并将所有超频功能设置为 "自动"。

请注意，在低风扇和高风扇模式之间切换的热键与 "Plus "键绑定。

处理器我们的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370的性能比我们数据库中采用相同处理器的普通笔记本电脑大约慢 15% 到 20%。华硕华硕 TUF Gaming A14的多线程性能大约快 35%。这是因为 Pocket 4 的 CPU 目标 TGP 值较低，下面的压力测试部分将对此进行说明。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2402 (2245.42-2499.38) GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1487 (1450.64-1776.28) GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø655 (525.83-745.35) GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø570 (564.07-573.67) Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100: Ø237 (229.37-246.24) Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1293 (1168.77-1576.35) Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030: Ø165.5 (117.01-202.8)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

95.2 pt GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

87.8 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

80.4 pt Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

75.2 pt MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

74.7 pt GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

70.8 pt Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 -14! AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

67.4 pt GPD Win 4 -2! AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

66.9 pt Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U -2! Intel Core i7-1255U

64.5 pt Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

61 pt GPD Pocket 3 -4! Intel Core i7-1195G7

49 pt Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

24.2 pt Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK -2! Intel Pentium Silver N5030

12.5 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23902, n=28)

20563 Points +24%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

16546 (14363.5min - 16546.4max) Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

15120 Points -9%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

14463 Points -13%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

13016 Points -21%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

11939 Points -28%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

10546 (8992.1min - 10546max) Points -36%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

10198 Points -38%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

10162 (10024.9min - 10161.8max) Points -39%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

9517 Points -42%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

3634 (3614.51min - 3633.97max) Points -78%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

1577 Points -90%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

911 Points -94%Cinebench R23 / Single Core

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1921 - 2049, n=21)

2010 Points 0%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2006 Points MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1770 Points -12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

1733 Points -14%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1712 Points -15%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1708 Points -15%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1703 Points -15%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

1656 Points -17%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

1534 Points -24%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

1389 Points -31%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1088 Points -46%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

747 Points -63%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

430 Points -79%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9280, n=20)

8399 Points +30%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

6449 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

5794 Points -10%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

5077 Points -21%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

4805 Points -25%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

4616 Points -28%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

4107 Points -36%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

3987 Points -38%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

3616 Points -44%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

1402 Points -78%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

590 Points -91%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

360 Points -94%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (753 - 804, n=20)

789 Points 0%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

787 Points MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

684 Points -13%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

672 Points -15%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

670 Points -15%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

664 Points -16%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

638 Points -19%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

602 Points -24%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

537 Points -32%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

427 Points -46%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

285 Points -64%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

171 Points -78%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3551, n=20)

3233 Points +29%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2499 (2245.42min - 2499.38max) Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

2336 (2041.02min - 2336.18max) Points -7%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2054 (1929.2min - 2053.81max) Points -18%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points -22%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1947 (1799.86min - 1946.66max) Points -22%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

1776 (1450.64min - 1776.28max) Points -29%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

1576 (1168.77min - 1576.35max) Points -37%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1539 (1503.99min - 1538.94max) Points -38%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

745 (525.83min - 745.35max) Points -70%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

574 (564.07min - 573.67max) Points -77%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

246 (229.37min - 246.24max) Points -90%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

203 Points -92%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

304 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (192.1 - 315, n=20)

301 Points -1%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

268 Points -12%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

266 Points -12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

262 Points -14%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

256 Points -16%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

246 Points -19%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

223 Points -27%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

207 Points -32%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

222 Points -27%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

176.6 Points -42%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

118.8 Points -61%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

86 Points -72%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU

Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

3580 Seconds * -1765%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

1956 Seconds * -919%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

821 Seconds * -328%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

382 Seconds * -99%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

315 Seconds * -64%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

304 Seconds * -58%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

283 Seconds * -47%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

246 Seconds * -28%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

239 Seconds * -24%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

214 Seconds * -11%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

192 Seconds * Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (139 - 192, n=21)

155.7 Seconds * +19%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66154 - 83714, n=20)

78384 MIPS +18%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

66618 MIPS Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

64454 MIPS -3%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

57550 MIPS -14%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

53599 MIPS -20%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

50223 MIPS -25%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

49708 MIPS -25%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

47579 MIPS -29%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

37320 MIPS -44%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

17053 MIPS -74%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

7532 MIPS -89%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

6598 MIPS -90%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5859 - 6497, n=20)

6159 MIPS 0%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

6143 MIPS Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

6077 MIPS -1%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

6064 MIPS -1%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

6012 MIPS -2%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

5472 MIPS -11%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

5318 MIPS -13%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

5264 MIPS -14%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

5150 MIPS -16%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

4168 MIPS -32%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

3046 MIPS -50%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

2735 MIPS -55%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11973 - 15994, n=22)

14565 Points +8%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

13426 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

12026 Points -10%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

10464 Points -22%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

10366 Points -23%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

9711 Points -28%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

9609 Points -28%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

2283 Points -83%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2904 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2965, n=22)

2884 Points -1%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

2550 Points -12%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2528 Points -13%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2442 Points -16%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

2433 Points -16%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1654 Points -43%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

1133 Points -61%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11394 - 15785, n=21)

14184 Points +18%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

11975 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

10713 Points -11%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

10076 Points -16%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

9258 Points -23%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

9225 Points -23%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

8821 Points -26%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

8205 Points -31%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

7737 Points -35%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

1911 Points -84%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

1221 Points -90%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2134 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2175, n=21)

2088 Points -2%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

1917 Points -10%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1879 Points -12%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1818 Points -15%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1780 Points -17%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

1712 Points -20%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

1549 Points -27%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

1278 Points -40%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

915 Points -57%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

512 Points -76%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=20)

25.3 fps +25%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

20.3 fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

18.7 fps -8%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

15.8 fps -22%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

15 fps -26%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

14.7 fps -28%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

12.9 fps -36%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

12.5 fps -38%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

10.1 fps -50%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

4.81 fps -76%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

1.72 fps -92%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

0.71 fps -97%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF

Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

137 s * -176%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

129.6 s * -161%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

63.8 s * -28%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (46.8 - 66.6, n=20)

53.8 s * -8%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

53.6 s * -8%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

51.4 s * -3%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

51.3 s * -3%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

50.9 s * -2%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

49.7 s * GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

49.2 s * +1%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

47.6 s * +4%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

46.2 s * +7%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean

Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030

1.402 sec * -236%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100

1.06 sec * -154%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U

0.678 sec * -63%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7

0.609 sec * -46%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U

0.52 sec * -25%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

0.52 sec * -25%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

0.4765 sec * -14%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

0.474 sec * -14%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4665 sec * -12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

0.4601 sec * -10%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

0.4167 sec * Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.3892 - 0.529, n=20)

0.414 sec * +1%CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean * ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2499 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit266 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit304 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6449 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)787 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core2006 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core16546 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core117 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core956 Points

Help... in comparison

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

97.7 pt GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

80.7 pt GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

58.5 pt Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

42.4 pt GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

28.9 pt Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

11.9 pt Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

6.5 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37804, n=19)

33684 KRay/s +31%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

25805 KRay/s GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

11279 KRay/s -56%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

8127 KRay/s -69%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

4760 KRay/s -82%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

1685 KRay/s -93%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

609 KRay/s -98%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 147937, n=20)

130001 Points +36%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

95655 Points GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

72386 Points -24%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

41353 Points -57%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

20576 Points -78%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

8977 Points -91%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

3917 Points -96%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5926, n=20)

5450 MB/s +22%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

4475 MB/s GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

2485 MB/s -44%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

2089 MB/s -53%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

1457 MB/s -67%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

595 MB/s -87%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

245 MB/s -95%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

86451 Points +7%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99232, n=20)

84794 Points +5%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

80927 Points Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

65820 Points -19%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

39180 Points -52%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

20893 Points -74%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

20636 Points -75%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19115, n=20)

18392 Points +11%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

16640 Points GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

11141 Points -33%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

5095 Points -69%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

3524 Points -79%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

1064 Points -94%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

742 Points -96%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 93798, n=19)

69637 Points +38%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

50357 Points GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

39913 Points -21%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

19899 Points -60%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

12994 Points -74%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

4415 Points -91%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

2158 Points -96%AIDA64 / CPU AES

GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

102968 MB/s +49%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 118806, n=20)

83863 MB/s +21%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

69125 MB/s GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

52338 MB/s -24%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

42553 MB/s -38%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

11223 MB/s -84%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

6215 MB/s -91%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=20)

1398 MB/s +30%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

1077 MB/s GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

631 MB/s -41%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

588 MB/s -45%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

261 MB/s -76%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

181.9 MB/s -83%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

81.4 MB/s -92%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20648, n=20)

18325 KRay/s +34%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

13665 KRay/s GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

5926 KRay/s -57%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

4400 KRay/s -68%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

2631 KRay/s -81%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

859 KRay/s -94%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

327 KRay/s -98%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

49112 MPixel/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=20)

47984 MPixel/s -2%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

44054 MPixel/s -10%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

31863 MPixel/s -35%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

27090 MPixel/s -45%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

15527 MPixel/s -68%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

5209 MPixel/s -89%

压力测试系统空闲在启动 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 会提升到 2.4 GHz 和 28 W，几分钟后又略微下降到 2.2 GHz 和 25 W。相比之下，采用相同处理器的大型笔记本电脑（如华硕 TUF Gaming A14）可以达到并维持更高的 TGP 值。

运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，如果启动涡轮风扇，GPU 会稳定在 2112 MHz 和 62 C。如果禁用涡轮风扇，时钟频率将略微降至 1850 MHz，而核心温度将略微升高，约为 67 C。如果游戏时担心风扇噪音，那么禁用涡轮风扇可能更合适，因为预计它不会对游戏性能造成明显影响。

赛博朋克 2077》压力（关闭涡轮风扇）

赛博朋克 2077》压力（开启涡轮风扇）

Prime95 压力

Prime95+FurMark 压力

CPU 平均时钟 (GHz)

GPU 时钟 (MHz)

CPU 平均温度 (°C)

系统闲置

Prime95 压力

2.2

Prime95 + FurMark Stress

1.9

732

赛博朋克 2077》压力（开启涡轮风扇）

0.5

2112

赛博朋克 2077》压力（关闭涡轮风扇）

0.5

1850

系统性能PCMark 结果显示，与即将上市的 Pocket 3 和目前市场上的大多数其他掌上电脑相比，PCMark 全面提升了性能。内存性能尤其明显提高，与全尺寸笔记本电脑的性能更为接近。

PCMark 10 标准

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

7471 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (6577 - 7735, n=12)

7368 Points -1%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

6394 Points -14%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

5257 Points -30%GPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

5153 Points -31%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

2823 Points -62%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

1838 Points -75%PCMark 10 / Essentials

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

11262 Points GPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

10606 Points -6%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9277 - 11262, n=12)

10521 Points -7%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

10205 Points -9%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

10062 Points -11%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

6898 Points -39%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

4614 Points -59%PCMark 10 / Productivity

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

10031 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (8497 - 10615, n=12)

9824 Points -2%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

9235 Points -8%GPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

7390 Points -26%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

6553 Points -35%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

4167 Points -58%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

3036 Points -70%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation

Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9334 - 11422, n=12)

10522 Points +5%GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

10017 Points GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

7529 Points -25%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

5978 Points -40%GPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

4737 Points -53%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

2126 Points -79%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

1204 Points -88%CrossMark / Overall

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

1847 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1402 - 2040, n=11)

1753 Points -5%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1575 Points -15%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1499 Points -19%CrossMark / Productivity

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

1719 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1253 - 1833, n=11)

1615 Points -6%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1596 Points -7%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1465 Points -15%CrossMark / Creativity

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2077 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1707 - 2439, n=11)

2044 Points -2%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1612 Points -22%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1596 Points -23%CrossMark / Responsiveness

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

1610 Points GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1457 Points -10%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1085 - 1645, n=11)

1424 Points -12%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1293 Points -20%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

323 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (252 - 363, n=11)

311 Points -4%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

293 Points -9%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

265 Points -18%GPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

259 Points -20%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

156.3 Points -52%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

95.4 Points -70%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

266 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (210 - 277, n=12)

250 Points -6%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

228 Points -14%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

220 Points -17%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

128.3 Points -52%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

3145 ms * -635%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

1122 ms * -162%GPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

652 ms * -52%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

594 ms * -39%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

574 ms * -34%Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (308 - 503, n=13)

431 ms * -1%GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

428 ms * * ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score

7471 pointsHelp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

89385 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 93640, n=20)

85782 MB/s -4%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

67017 MB/s -25%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

57029 MB/s -36%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

51518 MB/s -42%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

30676 MB/s -66%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

11294 MB/s -87%AIDA64 / Memory Read

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

100208 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 102937, n=20)

96207 MB/s -4%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

59579 MB/s -41%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

52892 MB/s -47%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

44068 MB/s -56%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

29183 MB/s -71%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

10011 MB/s -90%AIDA64 / Memory Write

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

98820 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (80685 - 108954, n=20)

96973 MB/s -2%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

62132 MB/s -37%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

58596 MB/s -41%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

51117 MB/s -48%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

35073 MB/s -65%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

10325 MB/s -90%AIDA64 / Memory Latency

GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M

110.3 ns * -5%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M

105.5 ns * Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0 - 119.4, n=20)

102.4 ns * +3%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

101.2 ns * +4%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

90.9 ns * +14%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605

72.5 ns * +31%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

67.6 ns * +36%* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟在 4K60 视频播放测试中，LatencyMon 没有显示重大的 DPC 问题，也没有出现掉帧现象，这与我们在旧版 Pocket 3 上观察到的情况类似。

延迟监控

驱动程序列表

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95

Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31

30049.6 μs * -6276%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

2080 μs * -341%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1942.1 μs * -312%GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

732.6 μs * -55%GPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

645 μs * -37%GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

471.3 μs * * ... smaller is better

存储设备我们的测试设备配备了 Kioxia KXG70ZNV1T02M.2 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘，传输速率超过 6800 MB/s。不幸的是，这一传输速率在大约一分钟的压力下是不可持续的，我们的 DiskSpd 循环测试结果如下所示，性能将骤降至 2900 MB/s 左右。Pocket 4 的设计不支持固态硬盘散热器，而散热器很可能会提高性能的可持续性。

CDM 8

AS 固态硬盘最多支持单个 M.2 PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD，无散热器

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

6483 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

4839 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

656.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

433.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq:

3824 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq:

4722 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

57.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

227.7 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdSequential Read:

5293.31MB/s

Sequential Write:

4532.38MB/s

4K Read:

58.86MB/s

4K Write:

200.12MB/s

4K-64 Read:

2260.35MB/s

4K-64 Write:

1400.18MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.082ms

Access Time Write:

0.065ms

Copy ISO:

3412.13MB/s

Copy Program:

1023.77MB/s

Copy Game:

2443.08MB/s

Score Read:

2849Points

Score Write:

2054Points

Score Total:

6318Points

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

6355MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

4867MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

3543MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

4625MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

3497MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

1720MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

59MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

227MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

3370MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent

GPD Pocket 4

93.2 pt GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

74.5 pt GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

64.6 pt Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

55.6 pt Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

18.6 pt Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

9.7 pt DiskSpd

seq readGPD Pocket 4

3543 (3463.87min - 3542.51max) MB/s GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

2500 (1776.5min - 2499.6max) MB/s -29%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

2492 (2463.73min - 2492.26max) MB/s -30%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

2119 (2112.04min - 2119.17max) MB/s -40%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

507 (503.57min - 506.5max) MB/s -86%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

121 (119.12min - 121.01max) MB/s -97% seq writeGPD Pocket 4

4625 (3480.81min - 4624.62max) MB/s GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

2757 (2694.69min - 2756.71max) MB/s -40%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

2623 (1837.52min - 2623.12max) MB/s -43%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1954 (1874.02min - 1954.13max) MB/s -58%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

373 (260.16min - 373.18max) MB/s -92%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

43 (39.93min - 42.99max) MB/s -99% seq q8 t1 readGPD Pocket 4

6355 (5605.9min - 6355.08max) MB/s Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

3499 (2732.17min - 3499.31max) MB/s -45%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

3410 (3100.94min - 3410.49max) MB/s -46%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

3051 (2850.45min - 3051.36max) MB/s -52%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

825 (723.33min - 825.23max) MB/s -87%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

124.2 (121.22min - 124.15max) MB/s -98% seq q8 t1 writeGPD Pocket 4

4867 (4538.6min - 4867.19max) MB/s GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

2842 (2705.33min - 2842.27max) MB/s -42%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

2824 (2685.19min - 2824.02max) MB/s -42%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

2410 (2398.51min - 2410.26max) MB/s -50%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

486 (349.94min - 485.99max) MB/s -90%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

46.7 (34.53min - 46.65max) MB/s -99% 4k q1 t1 readGPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

80.5 (80.36min - 80.45max) MB/s +36%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

79.7 (72.36min - 79.71max) MB/s +35%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

77.5 (77.45min - 77.51max) MB/s +31%GPD Pocket 4

59 (58.74min - 58.95max) MB/s Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

28 (20.74min - 27.95max) MB/s -53%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

5.55 (5.17min - 5.55max) MB/s -91% 4k q1 t1 writeGPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

279 (271.06min - 278.75max) MB/s +23%GPD Pocket 4

227 (220.18min - 227.04max) MB/s GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

213 (211.2min - 212.65max) MB/s -6%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

125.6 (122.85min - 125.61max) MB/s -45%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

59.2 (50.68min - 59.16max) MB/s -74%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

1.23 (0.99min - 1.23max) MB/s -99% 4k q32 t16 readGPD Pocket 4

3497 (1357.47min - 3497.01max) MB/s GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1647 (1638.92min - 1646.84max) MB/s -53%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

1403 (1068.66min - 1403.24max) MB/s -60%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

665 (643min - 665.11max) MB/s -81%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

378 (316.72min - 377.74max) MB/s -89%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

7.49 (7.35min - 7.49max) MB/s -100% 4k q32 t16 writeGPD Pocket 4

1720 (1666.75min - 1720.14max) MB/s GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

1330 (899.5min - 1330.47max) MB/s -23%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1113 (1107.59min - 1113.49max) MB/s -35%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

354 (346.58min - 354.16max) MB/s -79%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

310 (178.62min - 309.52max) MB/s -82%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

1.5 (1.33min - 1.5max) MB/s -100%AS SSD

Score TotalGPD Pocket 4

6318 Points GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

4445 Points -30%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

4241 Points -33%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

2783 Points -56%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

799 Points -87%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

774 Points -88% Score ReadGPD Pocket 4

2849 Points GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1859 Points -35%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

1723 Points -40%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

841 Points -70%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

383 Points -87%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

303 Points -89% Score WriteGPD Pocket 4

2054 Points GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

1846 Points -10%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1551 Points -24%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1437 Points -30%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

320 Points -84%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

247 Points -88% Seq ReadGPD Pocket 4

5293.31 MB/s GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

2981 MB/s -44%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

2972.75 MB/s -44%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

2802 MB/s -47%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

925 MB/s -83%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

702 MB/s -87% Seq WriteGPD Pocket 4

4532.38 MB/s GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

2598.37 MB/s -43%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

2555 MB/s -44%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1692 MB/s -63%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

446.1 MB/s -90%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

294 MB/s -94% 4K ReadGPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

72.4 MB/s +23%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

70.67 MB/s +20%GPD Pocket 4

58.86 MB/s Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

51.17 MB/s -13%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

25.23 MB/s -57%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

18 MB/s -69% 4K WriteGPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

234.6 MB/s +17%GPD Pocket 4

200.12 MB/s GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

177.01 MB/s -12%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

147.09 MB/s -26%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

46.51 MB/s -77%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

28.2 MB/s -86% 4K-64 ReadGPD Pocket 4

2260.35 MB/s GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1490.58 MB/s -34%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

1352 MB/s -40%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

509.42 MB/s -77%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

272 MB/s -88%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

207.6 MB/s -91% 4K-64 WriteGPD Pocket 4

1400.18 MB/s GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

1356 MB/s -3%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

1234.89 MB/s -12%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

1000.03 MB/s -29%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

228.5 MB/s -84%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

189.6 MB/s -86% Access Time ReadAsus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

0.302 ms * -268%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

0.266 ms * -224%GPD Pocket 4

0.082 ms * Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

0.05 ms * +39%GPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

0.045 ms * +45%GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

0.027 ms * +67% Access Time WriteGPD Win 4BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB

0.289 ms * -345%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAMicron MT 128GBCAV2U31

0.157 ms * -142%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ

0.088 ms * -35%GPD Pocket 4

0.065 ms * GPD Pocket 3BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB

0.049 ms * +25%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255USamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

0.03 ms * +54%* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPD Pocket 4 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3370 (2671.04-6425.82) Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6717 (6257.13-6734)

图形处理器性能3DMark 结果比我们数据库中集成了相同的 Radeon 890M图形处理器。因此，原始图形性能与 Radeon 780M或最新传统笔记本电脑上常见的 Arc 8 竞争产品相当接近。

有趣的是，根据我们的Fire Strike 结果表，在低风扇模式而不是高风扇模式下运行对性能的影响非常小。值得庆幸的是，如果使用电池供电，性能也不会人为降低。

电源配置文件图形得分物理得分综合得分性能模式（高风扇）8540251113114平衡模式（高风扇）8408249283048性能模式（低风扇）8479247083088电池电量8552248513113

3DMark 11

Fire Strike (低风扇模式）

Fire Strike (正常风扇模式）

Time Spy

快速通道

Steel Nomad

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent

Average AMD Radeon 890M

98.8 pt MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

94 pt GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

92.9 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

92.9 pt Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

88 pt Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 -1! AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

78.9 pt Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

75.1 pt GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

70.3 pt GPD Win 4AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

69.2 pt Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U

49 pt GPD Pocket 3Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7

25.2 pt Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA -1! Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100

9.5 pt Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030

3.8 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Average AMD Radeon 890M (12641 - 17483, n=16)

15140 Points +14%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

13828 Points +4%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

13267 Points Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

12918 Points -3%MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12205 Points -8%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

11254 Points -15%GPD Win 4AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

10261 Points -23%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

10150 Points -23%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U

6251 Points -53%GPD Pocket 3Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7

2942 Points -78%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100

1468 Points -89%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030

588 Points -96%3DMark

1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage AMD Radeon 890M (7999 - 10037, n=16)

9022 Points +6%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

8775 Points +3%MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

8618 Points +1%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

8540 Points Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

8397 Points -2%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

7459 Points -13%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

7129 Points -17%GPD Win 4AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

6865 Points -20%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

6683 Points -22%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U

5517 Points -35%GPD Pocket 3Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7

3236 Points -62%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030

411 Points -95%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsMSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3491 Points +6%Average AMD Radeon 890M (2942 - 3676, n=17)

3395 Points +3%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

3286 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

3196 Points -3%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

3021 Points -8%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2680 Points -18%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2554 Points -22%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2444 Points -26%GPD Win 4AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

2303 Points -30%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U

1606 Points -51%GPD Pocket 3Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7

783 Points -76%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100

322 Points -90%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030

113 Points -97%2560x1440 Time Spy ScoreMSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3829 Points +5%Average AMD Radeon 890M (3287 - 4073, n=16)

3758 Points +3%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

3642 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

3507 Points -4%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

3337 Points -8%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2954 Points -19%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2832 Points -22%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2832 Points -22%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

2688 Points -26%GPD Win 4AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

2559 Points -30%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U

1821 Points -50%GPD Pocket 3Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7

880 Points -76%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100

364 Points -90%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030

129 Points -96%3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance

12940 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score

34977 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

7942 points3DMark Time Spy Score

3642 points3DMark Steel Nomad Score

570 pointsHelp... in comparison

Blender

v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMDGPD Win 4AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

302 Seconds * v3.3 Classroom CPUAsus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100

3964 Seconds * -1204%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U

730 Seconds * -140%GPD Win 4AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

550 Seconds * -81%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

517 Seconds * -70%MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

437 Seconds * -44%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

420 Seconds * -38%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

393 Seconds * -29%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

365 Seconds * -20%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

304 Seconds * Average AMD Radeon 890M (214 - 306, n=15)

254 Seconds * +16%* ... smaller is better

游戏性能运行游戏时的平均性能大约比华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.由于采用了更新的架构和更快的内存，它比 Arc 8 或 Radeon 780M 快的幅度也比上述 3DMark 结果所显示的要大。虽然我们不建议将目标锁定为原始 1600p 分辨率，但像《博德之门 3》这样要求苛刻的游戏在 1200p 和低设置下仍能运行得相当不错。

1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16xAverage AMD Radeon 890M (160.9 - 186.8, n=6)

173.4 fps 0%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

173.2 (147min, 114P1) fps GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

136.1 (110min, 91P1) fps -21%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

128.2 (96min, 87P1) fps -26%1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16xGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

106 (86min, 79P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (81 - 111.2, n=9)

103.7 fps -2%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

94.9 (81min, 70P1) fps -10%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

78.1 (58min, 57P1) fps -26%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

72.2 (61min, 60P1) fps -32%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

47.4 (39min, 38P1) fps -55%1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16xGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

97.1 (81min, 74P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (76.8 - 102.9, n=9)

95.3 fps -2%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

86.7 (75min, 66P1) fps -11%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

70.4 (57min, 56P1) fps -27%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

65.2 (55min, 54P1) fps -33%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

43.5 (36min, 36P1) fps -55%1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16xAverage AMD Radeon 890M (64.2 - 78.1, n=9)

72.8 fps +1%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

72.3 (59min, 58P1) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

64.6 (55min, 53P1) fps -11%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

51.5 (44min, 44P1) fps -29%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

46.6 (39min, 39P1) fps -36%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

30.7 (24min, 25P1) fps -58%1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16xGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

20.2 (13min, 14P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (16.7 - 22, n=9)

20.2 fps 0%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

17.8 (14min, 14P1) fps -12%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

12.6 (9min, 9P1) fps -38%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

12.4 (8min, 8P1) fps -39%Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12)Average AMD Radeon 890M (104.3 - 172.1, n=6)

149.3 fps +1%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

148.2 fps GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

84.3 fps -43%1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

84.4 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (68.1 - 88.3, n=6)

82.2 fps -3%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

51.6 fps -39%1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

60.7 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (52.2 - 62.4, n=6)

58.9 fps -3%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

39.9 fps -34%1920x1080 High Preset (DX12)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

39.5 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (35.9 - 41.8, n=6)

39.3 fps -1%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

24.9 fps -37%1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

31.6 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (28.1 - 34.1, n=6)

31.5 fps 0%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

22.2 fps -30%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

1280x720 Lite QualityAverage AMD Radeon 890M (63.8 - 94.6, n=16)

83 fps +1%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

81.9 fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

80.7 fps -1%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

71.1 fps -13%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

63.2 fps -23%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

58.5 fps -29%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

57.1 fps -30%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

42.9 fps -48%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

27.7 fps -66%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

4.15 fps -95%1920x1080 Standard QualityGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

45.1 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (37 - 48.4, n=16)

43.4 fps -4%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

39.6 fps -12%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

38.3 fps -15%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

35.9 fps -20%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

35.2 fps -22%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

32.7 fps -27%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

32.3 fps -28%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

24.2 fps -46%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

16.8 fps -63%1920x1080 High QualityGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

32.5 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (26.4 - 34.4, n=16)

30.8 fps -5%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

30 fps -8%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

28.5 fps -12%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

26.3 fps -19%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

25.4 fps -22%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

24.5 fps -25%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

23.9 fps -26%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

16.8 fps -48%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

11.9 fps -63%Dota 2 Reborn

1280x720 min (0/3) fastestGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

166.6 (142.9min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (127.5 - 175.6, n=18)

157.2 fps -6%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

127 (107.9min) fps -24%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

120.7 (109.6min) fps -28%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

120.2 (104.3min) fps -28%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

107.9 (89.9min) fps -35%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

104.2 (80.8min) fps -37%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

98.6 (62.9min) fps -41%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

95.9 (79.5min) fps -42%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

44.7 (32.5min) fps -73%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

35 (30.6min) fps -79%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

34.7 (32.5min) fps -79%1366x768 med (1/3)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

129.7 (110.9min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (104.7 - 138.9, n=18)

126.8 fps -2%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

106.9 (90.1min) fps -18%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

105.3 (93.9min) fps -19%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

100.1 (86.2min) fps -23%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

84.3 (68.1min) fps -35%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

84.1 (43.1min) fps -35%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

82.2 (62.6min) fps -37%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

68.9 (44.4min) fps -47%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

33.6 (31.4min) fps -74%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

27.6 (20.6min) fps -79%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

11.5 (7.7min) fps -91%1920x1080 high (2/3)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

92.1 (82.9min) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

86.5 (77.6min) fps -6%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

83.8 (75min) fps -9%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

76.4 (67.4min) fps -17%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

67.8 (58.5min) fps -26%Average AMD Radeon 890M (34.8 - 100, n=18)

67.7 fps -26%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

67.4 (41.1min) fps -27%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

64.8 (53.8min) fps -30%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

45.4 (17.6min) fps -51%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

31.6 (29.6min) fps -66%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

14.2 (4.8min) fps -85%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

5.9 (4.2min) fps -94%1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best lookingGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

85 (75.3min) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

76.2 (68.4min) fps -10%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

74.5 (65.7min) fps -12%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

67.2 (58.9min) fps -21%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

63.6 (41.1min) fps -25%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

62.2 (53.9min) fps -27%Average AMD Radeon 890M (32.4 - 89.8, n=18)

61.9 fps -27%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

57 (48min) fps -33%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

41.2 (36.5min) fps -52%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

30.8 (28.6min) fps -64%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

13.4 (9.1min) fps -84%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

5.9 (3min) fps -93%Strange Brigade

1280x720 lowest AF:1Average AMD Radeon 890M (165.1 - 199.8, n=14)

183 fps 0%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

182.9 (126.7min, 158.5P1) fps Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

178.9 (108.2min, 151P1) fps -2%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

163 fps -11%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

161.1 (106.7min, 128.1P1) fps -12%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

145.7 (66.5min, 114.1P1) fps -20%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

143.2 (103.9min, 123P1) fps -22%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

88.9 (19.3min, 33P1) fps -51%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

70.6 (7.2min, 20.7P1) fps -61%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

8.5 (5min, 5P1) fps -95%1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

77.8 (62.9min, 66.8P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (69.3 - 82, n=14)

75.9 fps -2%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

72.5 (53.5min, 62.3P1) fps -7%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

71 fps -9%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

70.1 (36.7min, 60.4P1) fps -10%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

64.3 (31min, 51.5P1) fps -17%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

59.7 (48.5min, 51.9P1) fps -23%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

57.5 (44.8min, 50.9P1) fps -26%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

41.7 (15.8min, 23.2P1) fps -46%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

32.4 (7.4min, 15.4P1) fps -58%1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

65.9 (49.2min, 52.5P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (58.7 - 69.8, n=14)

64.2 fps -3%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

60 (38.9min, 46.3P1) fps -9%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

59 fps -10%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

58.1 (42.5min, 44.4P1) fps -12%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

53.3 (28.5min, 39.6P1) fps -19%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

49.7 (37.5min, 38.4P1) fps -25%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

47.8 (34.2min, 37.7P1) fps -27%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

32.5 (12.2min, 16.9P1) fps -51%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

26.7 (7.2min, 9.61P1) fps -59%1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

56.1 (42.7min, 45.4P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (48.5 - 59.7, n=14)

54.5 fps -3%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1) fps -8%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

49.9 (22.2min, 25.4P1) fps -11%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

46 fps -18%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

45.7 (27.3min, 34.4P1) fps -19%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

42.6 (32min, 33.6P1) fps -24%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

41.5 (29min, 31.8P1) fps -26%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

26.2 (7.4min, 9.36P1) fps -53%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

21.8 (5min, 5.93P1) fps -61%X-Plane 11.11

1280x720 low (fps_test=1)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

81 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (65.1 - 91.1, n=17)

79.3 fps -2%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

56.2 fps -31%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

54 fps -33%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

53.4 fps -34%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

51.6 fps -36%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

48.1 fps -41%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

46.3 fps -43%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

42 fps -48%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

22 fps -73%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

13.6 fps -83%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

5.01 fps -94%1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

65 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (54.4 - 69.9, n=17)

62 fps -5%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

45.1 fps -31%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

41.4 fps -36%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

40.6 fps -38%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

39.3 fps -40%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

36.6 fps -44%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

36.5 fps -44%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

33.1 fps -49%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

18.8 fps -71%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

12 fps -82%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

3.46 fps -95%1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

50.5 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (42.2 - 53.3, n=17)

48.2 fps -5%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

38.9 fps -23%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

33.5 fps -34%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

33.2 fps -34%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

32.9 fps -35%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

31.6 fps -37%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

31.5 fps -38%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

27.4 fps -46%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

19 fps -62%Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

10.9 fps -78%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

3.09 fps -94%GTA V

1024x768 Lowest Settings possibleGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

167.2 (5.26min, 111.1P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (149.1 - 174.3, n=18)

164.4 fps -2%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

158.1 (4.25min, 76.9P1) fps -5%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

144.5 (4.52min, 76.9P1) fps -14%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

140.3 (7.08min, 83.3P1) fps -16%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

104.3 (18.5min, 55.6P1) fps -38%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

66.1 (20.6min, 38.5P1) fps -60%Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605

11.6 (0.2759min, 2.71P1) fps -93%1920x1080 Lowest Settings possibleAverage AMD Radeon 890M (131.4 - 150.9, n=13)

141.8 fps +4%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

137 (4.79min, 83.3P1) fps GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

111.7 (19.5min, 76.9P1) fps -18%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

110 (17.3min, 50P1) fps -20%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

81.2 (12.5min, 55.6P1) fps -41%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

51.2 (18.8min, 34.5P1) fps -63%1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4xGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

157 (4.15min, 100P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (129.6 - 170.9, n=16)

154 fps -2%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

147.9 (4.22min, 83.3P1) fps -6%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

144 (6.34min, 83.3P1) fps -8%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

127.6 (6.6min, 76.9P1) fps -19%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

93.1 (10.4min, 52.6P1) fps -41%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

61.3 (10.6min, 33.3P1) fps -61%1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4xAverage AMD Radeon 890M (127.8 - 153.1, n=13)

139.5 fps +9%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

127.8 (4.52min, 83.3P1) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

120.9 (6.38min, 76.9P1) fps -5%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

114.6 (25min, 71.4P1) fps -10%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

107.2 (13.4min, 71.4P1) fps -16%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

79.6 (15.1min, 50P1) fps -38%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

45.7 (15.5min, 29.4P1) fps -64%1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8xGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

76.5 (8.24min, 52.6P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (68.4 - 80.2, n=18)

75.7 fps -1%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

67.7 (8.85min, 43.5P1) fps -12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

66.5 (11.6min, 43.5P1) fps -13%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

52.9 (7.78min, 37P1) fps -31%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

51.4 (1.467min, 27P1) fps -33%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

39.6 (1.981min, 23.8P1) fps -48%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

24.7 (11min, 18.2P1) fps -68%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

20.6 (4.49min, 12.2P1) fps -73%1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16xGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

32.8 (6.12min, 22.7P1) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (29 - 33.3, n=18)

31.4 fps -4%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

29 (6.01min, 20P1) fps -12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

27.1 (7.11min, 18.9P1) fps -17%GPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M

24.8 (3min, 15.4P1) fps -24%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

23.6 (4.17min, 15.9P1) fps -28%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

10.6 (5.04min, 7.41P1) fps -68%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

8.99 (2.43min, 5.38P1) fps -73%Baldur's Gate 3

1280x720 Low Preset AA:SMAverage AMD Radeon 890M (55.2 - 76.6, n=10)

64.9 fps +18%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

55.2 fps GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

45.8 fps -17%1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SMAverage AMD Radeon 890M (35 - 49.5, n=18)

43.5 fps +12%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

41.1 fps +6%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

38.8 fps Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

32.4 fps -16%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

31.7 fps -18%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

30.2 fps -22%1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TAverage AMD Radeon 890M (29.1 - 38.2, n=18)

34.7 fps +9%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

32.1 fps +1%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

31.8 fps Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

30.2 fps -5%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

25.6 fps -19%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

24.8 fps -22%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

24.3 fps -24%1920x1080 High Preset AA:TGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

29.4 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (24.1 - 31.8, n=18)

28.9 fps -2%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

26.6 fps -10%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

25.4 fps -14%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

21.7 fps -26%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

21.1 fps -28%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

20.7 fps -30%1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

29.1 fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (24 - 31.5, n=17)

28.4 fps -2%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

25.8 fps -11%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

24.5 fps -16%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

21.2 fps -27%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

20.3 fps -30%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

20.2 fps -31%Far Cry 5

1280x720 Low Preset AA:TGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

92 (79min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (75 - 101, n=11)

91.5 fps -1%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

78 fps -15%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

67 fps -27%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

60 (48min) fps -35%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

44 (31min) fps -52%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

28 fps -70%1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

55 (49min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (42 - 60, n=11)

54.5 fps -1%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

46 fps -16%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

40 fps -27%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

38 (34min) fps -31%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

28 (25min) fps -49%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

24 fps -56%1920x1080 High Preset AA:TGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

53 (47min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (39 - 55, n=11)

50.5 fps -5%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

42 fps -21%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

37 fps -30%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

36 (31min) fps -32%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

25 (23min) fps -53%Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

20 fps -62%1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

50 (44min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (33 - 52, n=11)

46.8 fps -6%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

40 fps -20%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

34 fps -32%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

34 (29min) fps -32%GPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

24 (21min) fps -52%Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)Average AMD Radeon 890M (72.5 - 85.1, n=10)

79.2 fps +9%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

72.5 (60min) fps GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

53.6 (43.6min) fps -26%1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)Average AMD Radeon 890M (40 - 52.5, n=18)

47.6 fps +3%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

46 (38.1min) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

44.1 (37.1min) fps -4%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

39.2 (33.2min) fps -15%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

37.8 (29.9min) fps -18%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

32.7 (27.3min) fps -29%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

32.49 (25.2427min) fps -29%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

30.9 (26.2min) fps -33%1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)Average AMD Radeon 890M (31.3 - 40.9, n=17)

37.2 fps +5%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

35.5 (30.3min) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

34.3 (30min) fps -3%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

29.5 (24.5min) fps -17%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

25.3 (21.8min) fps -29%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

24.9 (21.1min) fps -30%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

24.8 (20.9min) fps -30%1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

30.1 (24.8min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (24.9 - 32.3, n=17)

29 fps -4%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

27.2 (23.2min) fps -10%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

25.9 (22min) fps -14%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

23.6 (18.7min) fps -22%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

21.9 (18.9min) fps -27%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

20.1 (16.8min) fps -33%1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M

26.6 (22.1min) fps Average AMD Radeon 890M (23.1 - 28.4, n=18)

25.7 fps -3%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M

22.9 (19.3min) fps -14%Ayaneo Flip KBAMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

20.3 (15.7min) fps -24%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

19.8 (16.6min) fps -26%Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

19.5 (15.3min) fps -27%GPD Win Mini 2024 7"AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø25.1 (23.1-25.8)

lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)

167.2

157

76.5

32.8

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

166.6

129.7

92.1

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

81.9

45.1

32.5

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

50.5

Far Cry 5 (2018)

Strange Brigade (2018)

182.9

77.8

65.9

56.1

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)

84.4

60.7

39.5

31.6

F1 22 (2022)

106

97.1

72.3

20.2

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

38.8

31.8

29.4

29.1

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

35.5

30.1

26.6

排放量系统噪音内部风扇会随着负载的变化而频繁跳动，因此几乎始终处于活动状态，十分明显。在运行浏览器或视频播放等负载要求不高的情况下，风扇噪音可达 31 分贝（A），而在玩游戏时则高达 45 分贝（A）。该系统的噪音比 Pocket 3 大，与华硕 ROG Ally 差不多。

如果禁用涡轮风扇，那么游戏时的风扇噪音将徘徊在 38 dB(A)左右，而不是 45 dB(A)。

我们测试装置中的风扇会发出明显的呼呼声，如下图噪音图中 1K Hz 频率峰值所示。我们不确定这是否是该机型的特意设计，还是我们特定设备的独特问题。

风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：《赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：《赛博朋克 2077》：赛博朋克 2077，绿色：Prime95+FurMark 压力）

Noise Level

Idle

25.8 / 25.8 / 31 dB(A)Load

47 / 45.1 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.8 dB(A)

GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370GPD Win 4Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TBGPD Pocket 3Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TBAsus BR1104CGA-N00007XAUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMVAcer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKUHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJNoise-10%8%22%9%off / environment * (dB)22.824 -5%23.4 -3%23.59 -3%24.3 -7%Idle Minimum * (dB)25.831.2 -21%24.3 6%23.98 7%24.3 6%Idle Average * (dB)25.831.2 -21%25.6 1%23.98 7%24.3 6%Idle Maximum * (dB)3133.5 -8%25.6 17%23.98 23%24.3 22%Load Average * (dB)4745.5 3%38.3 19%24.09 49%37.9 19%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)43.3Load Maximum * (dB)45.149 -9%40.7 10%24.04 47%41.8 7%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)48.640.739.6* ... smaller is better

温度尽管采用了高性能 CPU 和小巧的外形，但表面温度却出奇地合理。键盘和底部表面的热点温度约为 36 摄氏度，而即将上市的 Pocket 3 则超过 40 摄氏度。不过，上面提到的 CPU 性能低于平均水平可能是导致表面温度低于预期的原因。

后排气管

运行高负荷时，交流适配器的温度可达 40 摄氏度以上

Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

31.4 °C33.4 °C30.6 °C 32.4 °C33.8 °C28 °C 26.4 °C27.4 °C23.8 °C

Maximum: 33.8 °CAverage: 29.7 °C

29 °C35.2 °C31.4 °C23.2 °C30 °C31.2 °C23.2 °C26 °C28.4 °C

Maximum: 35.2 °CAverage: 28.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 41 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR ThermometerMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk

26.6 °C26.4 °C25 °C 26.6 °C26.4 °C23.8 °C 24.4 °C23.8 °C23.2 °C

Maximum: 26.6 °CAverage: 25.1 °C

24.2 °C27.6 °C26.4 °C23.6 °C28 °C28.6 °C23.4 °C24.6 °C25 °C

Maximum: 28.6 °CAverage: 25.7 °C Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR ThermometerMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk

33.8 °C34.6 °C29.6 °C 33.6 °C33.4 °C27.6 °C 30 °C28.6 °C25.4 °C

Maximum: 34.6 °CAverage: 30.7 °C

31.6 °C35.8 °C34 °C25.2 °C33.8 °C35.4 °C24.6 °C29 °C30.8 °C

Maximum: 35.8 °CAverage: 31.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 41.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 31.7 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 38.3 °C / 101 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 37.8 °C / 100 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.7 °C / 89 F.(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 31.7 °C / 89 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 30.8 °C / 87.4 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).

系统空闲（C 盖）

系统空闲（D 盖）

赛博朋克 2077》压力（C 封面）

赛博朋克 2077》压力（D 封面）

GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890MGPD Win 4AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680MGPD Pocket 3Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsAsus BR1104CGA-N00007XAIntel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255UIntel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsAcer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKIntel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605Heat7%-19%-4%-11%-12%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)33.835 -4%40.4 -20%37.1 -10%44.6 -32%36.8 -9%Maximum Bottom * (°C)35.226.8 24%39.4 -12%40 -14%45.9 -30%46 -31%Idle Upper Side * (°C)26.628.4 -7%32.6 -23%26.2 2%24.8 7%27.8 -5%Idle Bottom * (°C)28.625 13%34.4 -20%26.6 7%25.3 12%28.8 -1%* ... smaller is better

发言人集成立体声（2x 2 W）扬声器的音量出奇地大，略高于 91 dB(A)，而大多数笔记本电脑的音量小于 90 dB(A)。不过，正如尖锐的粉红噪声图所示，低音效果差在意料之中。

粉红噪音

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 21% similar, 47% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理耗电量该系统的耗电量比 Win 4在运行 Prime95 或游戏等高负载时，系统功耗比 Win 4 手持设备高出约 20%。不过，与 Ryzen 7 6800U 相比，CPU 和 GPU 性能分别提高了约 60% 和 25% 至 50%，尽管硬件要求更高，但每瓦性能却有所提高。

当 CPU 的利用率达到 100%时，我们可以记录到小型（约 6.6 x 6.6 x 2.9 厘米）USB-C AC 适配器的最大功耗为 57 瓦。如果同时进行游戏，较高的开销可为其他 USB 设备供电，并获得不错的充电速度。

3DMark 06 消耗量

赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高清消费

启动 Prime95 应力时，耗电量将飙升至 53 W

Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.9 / 3.5 WattIdle 6 / 8.8 / 9.2 Watt

Load

53.1 / 56.4 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

GPD Pocket 4Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"GPD Win 4R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 6"GPD Pocket 3i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XAN100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31, TN, 1366x768, 11.6"Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255Ui7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKPentium N5030, UHD Graphics 605, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"Power Consumption-19%-12%56%-6%55%Idle Minimum * (Watt)67.5 -25%9.6 -60%2.483 59%5.1 15%2.8 53%Idle Average * (Watt)8.812.4 -41%11 -25%4.2429 52%9.8 -11%4.8 45%Idle Maximum * (Watt)9.213 -41%11.8 -28%4.8869 47%11.3 -23%5.5 40%Load Average * (Watt)53.146 13%39 27%13.04 75%47.5 11%11.8 78%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)45.7Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)50.1Load Maximum * (Watt)56.456 1%42 26%28.507 49%68.5 -21%23.5 58%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)45.236.412.43611.8* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø55 (51.9-56.3) GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø45.7 (40.7-56) GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.91 (6.61-8.17) GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.59 (7.66-10.8) GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø50.1 (47.5-56.9)

Power Consumption external Monitor

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø51 (48.9-52.7) GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø45.7 (43.8-52.6) GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø46.3 (40.7-47.5) GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø47 (45.9-47.6) GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.4 (51.2-54) GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø45 (39.1-52.9) GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.08 (5.75-8.37) GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.72 (7.14-9.51) GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø45.7 (44.8-47)

电池寿命45 瓦时电池的续航时间从短到一般不等，视应用而定。如果浏览网页，用户可以期待 6 小时左右的使用时间，而不间断的游戏只能持续 60 到 90 分钟。

从空电到满电的充电时间相对较短，为 90 分钟。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

6h 13min

Load (maximum brightness)

1h 03min

GPD Pocket 4Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 45 WhGPD Win 4R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 WhGPD Pocket 3i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 39 WhAsus BR1104CGA-N00007XAN100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), 50 WhMicrosoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255Ui7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 WhAcer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KKPentium N5030, UHD Graphics 605, 50.3 WhBattery Runtime20%-3%121%24%44%WiFi v1.3 (h)6.27.5 21%6 -3%13.7 121%7.5 21%8.9 44%Load (h)1.11.3 18%1.4 27%Reader / Idle (h)9.7H.264 (h)9.4

笔记本检查评级

Back to the verdict

GPD Pocket 4

- 01/31/2025 v8

Allen Ngo

Chassis85 / 98 → 87%

Mechanical Inputs72%

Pointing Device81%

Connectivity67 / 68 → 98%

Weight79 / 69-83 → 69%

Battery70%

Display73%

Games Performance55 / 75 → 74%

Application Performance86 / 92 → 93%

AI Performance90%

Temperature94%

Noise80%

Audio75 / 91 → 82%

Camera45 / 75 → 60%

Add Points+1%

Average57%

80%

Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use69.2%Repairability40%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 30.3%

More articles related to this deviceGPD Pocket 4 (Pocket Series)News•GPD 公布 Pocket 4 售价：搭载 AMD 处理器的超便携笔记本电脑即将上市 |Review•GPD Pocket 3可转换UMPC回顾。比许多英特尔EVO笔记本电脑更快

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011contact me via: @AllenNgoNBCTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 627884 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

一款叫“超信”的通讯工具今日上线，主打安全性中秋節柚子多到吃不完？只要跟著4個小技巧，就能有效延長保存期限

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱

相关推荐

微信换手机登录全攻略：简单上手，安全无忧

战报-瑞典1-1阿根廷北欧铁桶阵困锁潘帕斯烈风

阴债鬼灯笼知识阴间灯笼图片

友情链接

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱

相关推荐

微信换手机登录全攻略：简单上手，安全无忧

战报-瑞典1-1阿根廷 北欧铁桶阵困锁潘帕斯烈风

阴债鬼灯笼知识 阴间灯笼图片

友情链接

战报-瑞典1-1阿根廷北欧铁桶阵困锁潘帕斯烈风

阴债鬼灯笼知识阴间灯笼图片